10h ago
Disputing risk ratings on Xerberus
$Kaito was rated B on @Xerberus_io.
“Low protocol activity”
“Unverified contract sources”
Both are incorrect. So I went on Xerberus, challenged the claims, and submitted on chain evidence. The platform reviewed, validated and rewarded $XER for each fix.
→ This isn’t about defending a token. It’s about making protocol reputations verifiable, not arbitrary.
In DeFi, flawed risk data propagates through aggregators, DEXs, lending markets. If we don’t dispute it, we normalize it. Xerberus turns reputation correction into an incentive layer.
Protocols can now earn back trust, transparently. Contributors can earn by enforcing truth, collectively.
If a token’s rating is off, don’t wait.
Fix it. Get paid. Make risk credible.
6.09K
112
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.