They are different use cases imo. It makes sense to have a “simple” privacy coin which doesn’t do anything else, similar to BTC being a rock. Then, you want privacy for any onchain transaction and business logic. TAM for the latter is 100x the size. Chainlink
I'm glad privacy is a big narrative but couldnt agree more here. Chainlink's approach to being able to attach privacy to any part of a onchain transaction—amount, sender/receiver, computation, external connections, etc—is way more practical/useful than a privacy specific coin.
2.19K
3
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.