Volatility isn’t the enemy if your custody stays put and your routes are smart. That’s the edge @moremarketsxyz is leaning into: keep assets in user-controlled vaults, rotate strategies across ecosystems, and let withdrawals stay simple even when markets snap. I dug back through their track record Predicate partnership for real-time on-chain AML/CFT, the NEAR Chain Signatures write-up explaining native custody + delegated execution, and the Mizu/“Essential Trio” launch notes (late Oct 2025) that formalized cross-chain optimization and the story is consistent: control first, then yield. ❯ Expanded opportunities: FXRP on Flare today, plus institutional routes bootstrapped via Mizu’s framework ❯ Multi-ecosystem growth: intents/Chain Sigs for ETH/BTC/USD while XRP stays native ❯ Liquidity depth: programmatic routing instead of chasing a single farm ❯ Always in your hands: self-custodial vaults, independent audits, anytime withdrawal My methodology: skimmed the newsroom posts and technical docs above, then sanity-checked the model against prior comms and audited-infra claims. Mini-read: diversified sources (lending/DEX fees/incentives; soon more fee income) > single-pool APR when volatility spikes. Compare: CEX earn gives convenience but not keys; classic bridges add wrap risk; this pattern keeps custody and abstracts the routing. Claim check: the control-centric thesis holds; the only caveat is policy transparency keep surfacing venues and limits in-app. User step: do a small deposit, trigger a same-day withdrawal, and time it. The goal is to do MORE while doing less and this is how you get there. Looping STBL for the self-custody bar