I’m in Buenos Aires right now at the DeFi Security Summit, where I joined a panel on AI and Web3 security along with @blocksec (EigenLabs), @ChanniGreenwall (Olympix), @jack__sanford (Sherlock), and @nicowaisman (Xbow). What not long ago felt like a “distant future” is now being discussed as a very concrete roadmap for the coming years: both defensive and offensive AI‑powered technologies are going to advance rapidly, especially in vulnerability discovery. Everything auditors do today manually and through a patchwork of tools is gradually being bundled into more powerful and accessible automated stacks. It’s important to look at reality soberly: the hope that we can reliably “fence off” models from undesirable use is illusory. Any sufficiently capable model is, by definition, dual‑use. Providers will add restrictions, filters, policies — but that’s not a fundamental barrier. Anyone with motivation and resources will spin up a self‑hosted model, assemble their own agentic stack, and use the same technologies without worrying about ToS. You can’t design security under the assumption that attackers won’t have access to these tools. The economics of attacks are also far from straightforward. In the short term, attacks will get cheaper: more automation, more “wide‑area bombardment,” more exhaustive exploration of states and configurations without humans in the loop. But over the long run, as defensive practices and tools catch up, successful attacks will become more expensive: coverage will improve, trivial bugs will disappear, and effective breaches will require serious infrastructure, preparation, and expertise. This will shift the balance toward fewer incidents — but those that do happen will be far more complex and costly. My main takeaway: we’ll have to revisit the entire security lifecycle, not just “cosmetically improve” audits. How we describe and understand risk profiles, how threat models evolve with AI in the picture, how we structure development, reviews, testing, deployment, on‑chain monitoring, incident response, and post‑mortems — all of this will need to be rethought. Traditional audits will remain a key piece, but they can no longer be the sole center of gravity. The reality is that AI symmetrically amplifies both defenders and attackers — and Web3 security will have to adapt its entire operating model to this asymmetric arms race.
699
6
De inhoud op deze pagina wordt geleverd door derden. Tenzij anders vermeld, is OKX niet de auteur van het (de) geciteerde artikel(en) en claimt geen auteursrecht op de materialen. De inhoud is alleen bedoeld voor informatieve doeleinden en vertegenwoordigt niet de standpunten van OKX. Het is niet bedoeld als een goedkeuring van welke aard dan ook en mag niet worden beschouwd als beleggingsadvies of een uitnodiging tot het kopen of verkopen van digitale bezittingen. Voor zover generatieve AI wordt gebruikt om samenvattingen of andere informatie te verstrekken, kan deze door AI gegenereerde inhoud onnauwkeurig of inconsistent zijn. Lees het gelinkte artikel voor meer details en informatie. OKX is niet verantwoordelijk voor inhoud gehost op sites van een derde partij. Het bezitten van digitale activa, waaronder stablecoins en NFT's, brengt een hoge mate van risico met zich mee en de waarde van deze activa kan sterk fluctueren. Overweeg zorgvuldig of de handel in of het bezit van digitale activa geschikt voor je is in het licht van je financiële situatie.