20 小時前
So... a 1e floor would buy and burn something like 2.4M in supply on the way up sending MC to 50M+ $VIBESTR? And only .29 away? Early.
22 小時前
This is the way, and frankly, what I always hoped would happen as NFT teams started to introduce fungibles. Feels reminiscent of the energy we had in 2021. Real alignment between collection, token, & studio –with success predicated on collective growth (not smoke/mirrors and engineering). By the way, if you want to extrapolate some #s, @GoodVibesClub back @ 1E floor likely sends $VIBESTR to a $50M+ val, probably much higher. → Would inject something like $2.5M in buy pressure into the token. → And would burn the vast majority of that, likely amounting to 15-20% of the total supply gone. → Team builds & grows, value automatically flows down & throughout the value chain. One of the most elegant things about the Strategy model = it simplifies focus and adds logic to any tokenomic system you build around it. → GVC uniquely has 5% royalties enforced. Keeps far more $$$ in the ecosystem. This one can't be easily replicated, and is a very crucial cog. Crazy? I don't think so at all, especially when you look at $DOOD ($65M), $ANIME ($100M), $APE ($420M), $PENGU ($2BN) as comps; minus the large future unlocks. Dream a little bigger, darling. New Era of Vibes™. (shouts to @DGMD22 for the vibe math).
1.71萬
157
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。