Is @arbitrumdao_gov Really Safe…?
Previously, during the OAT Committee member election, there was also a case where a candidate bought 20 million ARB voting power on @lobbyfinance . At that time, other ARB holders voted defensively to prevent a potential governance attack.

In this case, Blockful intentionally conducted a “stress test” to expose vulnerabilities in Arbitrum’s governance and clearly stated on the forum that they would voluntarily resign if elected.
The core issue lies in the steady decline of delegated voting power, a problem that was also pointed out in Nethermind’s analysis of Arbitrum governance.
Ultimately, this happens because token holders lack incentives to either vote actively or delegate passively — a structural weakness that can affect not only Arbitrum but any token-based governance system.
Potential solutions could be rewarding governance participation by:
1. Distributing a portion of newly issued tokens
2. Granting priority on txs inclusion
Follow The Ticker is ETH to stay updated on privacy on Ethereum.
The Ticker is ETH team creates content about Ethereum, proudly selected by @OctantApp Epoch 9.
If you like our content, check out TG channel too:
1,028
3
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。